tomskipetski5-v-amanmafia

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 07:50 p.m.

New Case

Tomskipetski5 v. AmanMafia

Case Type

civil

Case Number

CV-218-25

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 07:51 p.m.

Case Modified

@Brenda Cornwallis

has added @Toby Ellis, Esq. to the case channel.

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-03 07:51 p.m.

Case Modified

@Brenda Cornwallis

has added @Charlolel to the case channel.

Charlolel 2025-06-04 11:48 a.m.

Hello your honor, I expected the civil complaint to be submitted tonight.

Charlolel 2025-06-06 12:02 p.m.

Sorry for the delay, I will submit it tonight currently writing it. I got busy with work and other tasks.

Charlolel 2025-06-06 02:52 p.m.

@Brenda Cornwallis

Charlolel 2025-06-06 02:53 p.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

Charlolel 2025-06-06 02:53 p.m.

Respectully submitted

Charlolel 2025-06-06 03:09 p.m.

@AlbertBlackwell

Charlolel 2025-06-11 06:33 p.m.

Any updates on this ? @Evexom

Charlolel 2025-06-12 06:46 p.m.

@cabot

can i have this resassigned please

cabot 2025-06-12 06:51 p.m.

Hello

cabot 2025-06-12 06:51 p.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-12 07:04 p.m.

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-12 07:06 p.m.

Complaint accepted

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-12 07:06 p.m.

Draft summons

Charlolel 2025-06-13 08:53 a.m.

For the record I did submit that same document on the website

Charlolel 2025-06-13 08:55 a.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

Once you sign the summons can a court clerk summon the defendant?

Charlolel 2025-06-13 08:56 a.m.

(the civil complaint)

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-13 08:56 a.m.

signed

Charlolel 2025-06-13 08:58 a.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-13 08:59 a.m.

@AlbertBlackwell

please serve

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-13 12:21 p.m.

Case Modified

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

has added @AlbertBlackwell to the case channel.

AlbertBlackwell 2025-06-13 12:22 p.m.

Served.

Charlolel 2025-06-13 01:20 p.m.

@Not Brandon

Charlolel 2025-06-13 01:20 p.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

hes already in the server

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-13 01:27 p.m.

Case Modified

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

has added @Not Brandon to the case channel.

Charlolel 2025-06-15 10:06 p.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

Hello it has been 48h and the defendant has yet to respond to the civil complaint

Charlolel 2025-06-15 10:08 p.m.

Per the summon the defendant has 3 days left to respond correct?

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-16 05:18 a.m.

Case Modified

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

has added @walter! to the case channel.

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 05:18 a.m.

@walter!

hello

Charlolel 2025-06-16 09:26 a.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

Aman confirmed notsfeelings was his attorney? I attempt to reach him but was never able to

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 09:26 a.m.

Well he filed a NOA so I'd assume so

Charlolel 2025-06-16 09:27 a.m.

Respectfully your honor, I would like this court to ensure aman actually confirmed notsfeeling is his attorney

Charlolel 2025-06-16 09:28 a.m.

I want to make sure everything is done right, your honor. Otherwise we risk this case being dismisesed for vice of procedure or something.

Charlolel 2025-06-16 09:28 a.m.

dismissed*

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 09:28 a.m.

What

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 09:28 a.m.

Stop jumping ahead

Charlolel 2025-06-16 09:33 a.m.

Well your honor there is already a huge issue for me. The NOA says he's Counsel of Record
Nicklaus, Popplewell, & Associates LLP . But AmanMafia never joined their discord server and AmanMafia last time was seen speaking in discord was in Clark County the 30th of May 4 weeks ago.

Charlolel 2025-06-16 09:34 a.m.

(clark county main discord server https://discord.com/channels/1183291978499235890/1242328252744208425/1377925938351837185)

walter! 2025-06-16 12:16 p.m.

accusing me of fraud is crazy

walter! 2025-06-16 12:22 p.m.

for the record here

walter! 2025-06-16 12:22 p.m.

walter! 2025-06-16 12:25 p.m.

and here is the entire substantive communication record between opposing counsel and I

walter! 2025-06-16 12:26 p.m.

after which I was promptly blocked

walter! 2025-06-16 12:27 p.m.

just to make sure we are being transparent

Charlolel 2025-06-16 12:40 p.m.

I will sending a motion to strike the notice of appearence tonight your honor. As you can see even in all the screenshots he sent to be transparent he still hasn't proved to the court the client actually contacted him or the other way around.

Charlolel 2025-06-16 12:40 p.m.

Well alleged client at this point.

walter! 2025-06-16 12:49 p.m.

I wasn’t proving anything

it’s for transparency

walter! 2025-06-16 12:50 p.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

I hope maybe the court can put this matter to rest by instructing the plaintiff to stop?

walter! 2025-06-16 12:51 p.m.

or something here

walter! 2025-06-16 12:51 p.m.

this is insane behaviour LOL

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:00 p.m.

Well this isn't going anywhere, but I had some spare time to complete the motion earlier then expected. I hereby submit the following ; https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Y0lxvPS_LxNMyNC80ZnVvXJdlD7-AYw-/view?usp=sharing

CV-218-25 Plaintiff, Motion to Strike (1).pdf

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:01 p.m.

That's baseless

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:01 p.m.

And denied in full

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:02 p.m.

And frankly I do not appreciate you accusing opposing counsel of fraudulent misrepresentation in open court

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:02 p.m.

@walter!

is your client present in this server

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:02 p.m.

Your honor I wish I didn't need to, but at this point of time all evidence points to the fact that AmanMafia has never actually contacted notsfeelings to represent him.

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:03 p.m.

As I said to nicklaus in private messages I wish to get it resolved as soon as possible, but he denied my request to send a simple screenshot or contract to show the proof.

walter! 2025-06-16 01:05 p.m.

can we put an end to this your honor

walter! 2025-06-16 01:05 p.m.

much more and I will unfortunately be forced to ask for sanctions

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:06 p.m.

You have nothing to back that up. Nicklaus who is a partner at his firm affirmed that he was indeed a client of theirs. Now, I highly doubt he is acting fraudulently, as every competent attorney well knows that fraudulent misrepresentation has severe consequences. Nick nor Walter is obliged to disclose to you correspondence between him and his client which is covered by privilege purely on your suspicion that he isn't his client

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:06 p.m.

End off

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

So you will simply believe the word of notsfeelings without any evidence that Aman actually hired him to represent his interest?

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

Is your client able to join the server

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

Did I say that

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

He's already here @Not Brandon

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

He hasnt spoken once since he was added

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

Case Modified

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

has added @Not Brandon to the case channel.

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

3 Days ago

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:07 p.m.

@Not Brandon

can you please confirm that Mr. Feelings is your attorney

Charlolel 2025-06-16 01:08 p.m.

Can we put a deadline for his response, your honor?

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-16 01:08 p.m.

Can you be quiet please

walter! 2025-06-16 01:16 p.m.

your honor as respectfully as possible, and this will be my last transmission before I finish my break and go back to work, but this is a crusade against my client and through me, as his counsel, on the basis of some personal animus against me. we respectfully move for sanctions on the basis that his actions here are motivated strictly by some kind of outside motivation—though I am beginning to be concerned that perhaps the motivation is to deprive my client of proper legal counsel (not an accusation, no answer required)

from the very start, Plaintiff has been engaged in a course of conduct which has suggested a deep personal animus against me; he went so far as to begin slinging personal insults against me regarding my worth and capabilities, an unprompted escalation. lastly, when he has been told to leave it, he refuses, further driving this animus

walter! 2025-06-16 01:16 p.m.

I will respond again after my shift

Charlolel 2025-06-17 01:01 p.m.

Your honor, it has been 24h now and he still hasn't responded.

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-17 01:21 p.m.

@Not Brandon

answe this please

Not Brandon 2025-06-17 09:23 p.m.

Yes

walter! 2025-06-18 11:56 a.m.

my motion will be submitted by the end of today per the summons requirements @Toby Ellis, Esq.

walter! 2025-06-18 11:56 a.m.

just a heads up

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-18 12:13 p.m.

Yea yes

walter! 2025-06-18 09:33 p.m.

Motion to dismiss @Toby Ellis, Esq.
cc: @Charlolel

walter! 2025-06-18 09:34 p.m.

Motion to impose sanctions @Toby Ellis, Esq.
cc: @Charlolel

Charlolel 2025-06-18 10:02 p.m.

Ah yes chatgpt wrote up motions, I will wrkt

Charlolel 2025-06-18 10:02 p.m.

-wait for the judge to review those motions before responding

Charlolel 2025-06-18 10:05 p.m.

E.g: Motion to dismiss (basketball) never even mentioned in my civil complaint the word basketball

Charlolel 2025-06-18 10:05 p.m.

civil complaint:

walter! 2025-06-18 10:07 p.m.

"even if"

walter! 2025-06-18 10:07 p.m.

sir i'm calling out how absurd you are being

walter! 2025-06-18 10:07 p.m.

my firm will pay for a course discussing literary devices if plaintiff is amenable to that

walter! 2025-06-20 08:53 p.m.

fair notice: i will be out of the province until june 27

I don't expect that this will need any attention before then as there is a matter pending ruling

Charlolel 2025-06-22 11:29 p.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

Charlolel 2025-06-22 11:30 p.m.

I got a response ready to go if the motion to dismiss is accepted as it is

Charlolel 2025-06-23 08:21 p.m.

I dont wanna spam but @Toby Ellis, Esq.

clerkFlow Bot2025-06-23 08:22 p.m.

Case Modified

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

has added @bommes to the case channel.

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-23 08:22 p.m.

@bommes

is assigned to hear pre-trial

Charlolel 2025-06-23 08:22 p.m.

bommes 2025-06-24 03:43 a.m.

ok so a motion to dismiss is it?

bommes 2025-06-24 03:46 a.m.

bommes 2025-06-24 03:47 a.m.

@Charlolel

What lead you to conclude that the defendant was responsible for the car bomb? Seems pretty far fetched to me.

Charlolel 2025-06-24 08:32 a.m.

I have video evidence for the court @bommes it's crystal clear

Charlolel 2025-06-24 08:33 a.m.

But I'm not entirely sure why we are arguing the facts of the case in pre trial.

bommes 2025-06-24 08:46 a.m.

@Charlolel

You said you had a response ready if the motion to dismiss were granted. I’ll allow you to present it because as is, I fail to see how any of this is linked to the defendant and the defence brings up some very strong arguments.(edited)

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 08:57 a.m.

What

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 08:57 a.m.

Are

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 08:57 a.m.

You

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 08:57 a.m.

About

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 08:58 a.m.

This is very much a matter for pre-trial

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 08:58 a.m.

A motion to dismiss based on failure to state claim is for pre-trial????

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 08:58 a.m.

Whether or not you have evidence of the alleged conduct is irrelevant in this stage

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 09:00 a.m.

What is in question, is whether or not your complaint meets the standard of which all civil complaints must meet when filed. You saying you have evidence of the alleged conduct is basically saying "don't dismiss my case please, I have evidence of the alleged conduct" that doesn't matter if you have evidence, that's a matter for trial. What does matter, like I just said, is if your complaint is sufficient

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 09:00 a.m.

So please don't then accuse opposing counsel of using ChatGPT when you just implied that this isn't a pre-trial matter

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 09:05 a.m.

You're going to be held in contempt if you don't fix your submission format within 5 minutes

Charlolel 2025-06-24 09:05 a.m.

CV-218-25 Response to the Motion to Dismiss

Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yNUnf6-lPjs8q4erw5QBe3j3eylGmFa4/view?usp=sharing

CC: @AlbertBlackwell

@Evexom

CV-218-25 Response to the Motion to Dismiss.pdf

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-06-24 09:06 a.m.

There we go

bommes 2025-06-24 11:15 a.m.

Ruling written, now awaiting approval from @Toby Ellis, Esq.

CC: @Charlolel @walter!

bommes 2025-06-24 11:31 a.m.

@Clerk of the Court

Hello could you please attach this to the relevant case card on the website? Thank you!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PU7CVbAPH4Zomnwc7ZRNEEmFOnyPrmp_/view?usp=sharing

CV-218-25 MTD Ruling.pdf

bommes 2025-06-24 11:31 a.m.

@Charlolel

@walter!

ruling is out, motion for sanctions up next. plaintiff, you have 24 hours to respond to the motion before it's considered uncontested

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:35 a.m.

So my motion to sanction him is automatically denied but his motion is accepted?

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:35 a.m.

Alright I guess I will have to respond

bommes 2025-06-24 11:36 a.m.

wait

bommes 2025-06-24 11:36 a.m.

yes you have to respond to the motion

bommes 2025-06-24 11:36 a.m.

unless you are fine with being sanctioned, which i doubt

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:37 a.m.

Ah yes making sure the defendant actually agress to being defended by him is a good reason to sanction me

bommes 2025-06-24 11:37 a.m.

and as to your motion being denied, you do know that an attorney-client relationship can start before a dime is paid?

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:38 a.m.

I didn't ask him to violate it at any point, there are plenty of ways to prove that

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:38 a.m.

Thats why as soon as aman confirmed that he as actually represented by him I stopped arguing.

bommes 2025-06-24 11:39 a.m.

then I assume you can also see why your motion ended up being denied outright

either way, response within 24 hours

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:48 a.m.

let me send it with the format

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:48 a.m.

Response to Sanction

(https://drive.google.com/file/d/18b_a4_cogeMjztQC5-rb95mqILj2rlfK/view?usp=sharing%20@)

CC: @Kezzera

@Evexom

Response to Sanction CV-218-25.pdf

bommes 2025-06-24 11:50 a.m.

why did you ping the chief judge(edited)

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:50 a.m.

wrong albert my bad

Charlolel 2025-06-24 11:50 a.m.

@AlbertBlackwell

AlbertBlackwell 2025-06-25 11:33 a.m.

All filings up to date.

Charlolel 2025-06-26 10:09 p.m.

When can we expect a ruling on the last motion?

walter! 2025-06-27 01:26 p.m.

@bommes

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

bommes 2025-06-27 03:33 p.m.

oh uh yeah

bommes 2025-06-27 03:34 p.m.

we talked about it but it wasn't finalised

bommes 2025-06-27 03:34 p.m.

@Toby Ellis, Esq.

walter! 2025-06-28 09:30 a.m.

@bommes

bommes 2025-06-28 10:32 a.m.

While the motion is not without merit, we, in this case referring to both me and toby, are not granting it. It is not against any ethical guideline or rule to challenge whether an attorney appearing for a party does so lawfully.

However we do acknowledge that some form of disciplining must happen and as such we will be issuing a firm warning to the plaintiff that, if he is to find himself in a similar situation going forward, he would do well to voice his concerns in a more respectful and suitable manner, being a pro-se litigant does not exempt you from basic etiquette.

CC: @walter! @Charlolel @Toby Ellis, Esq.

Charlolel 2025-06-28 11:40 a.m.

Toby Ellis, Esq. 2025-07-04 11:44 a.m.

@Prothonotary's Office

please archive

clerkFlow Bot2025-07-04 11:45 a.m.

Channel Permissions Synced

Permissions have been synced to Volume VIII Archives.